For more information, see " About repositories." If you have sensitive data in your site's repository, you may want to remove the data before publishing. Warning: GitHub Pages sites are publicly available on the internet, even if the repository for the site is private. If you're not creating your site in an existing repository, see " Creating a repository for your site." For more information, see " About repositories."īefore you can create your site, you must have a repository for your site on GitHub. If your user or organization name contains uppercase letters, you must lowercase the letters.įor more information, see " About GitHub Pages."Ĭhoose a repository visibility. If you're creating a user or organization site, your repository must be named. Type a name for your repository and an optional description. Use the Owner dropdown menu to select the account you want to own the repository. In the upper-right corner of any page, use the drop-down menu, and select New repository. If you want to create a site in an existing repository, skip to the " Creating your site" section. If the account that owns the repository uses GitHub Free or GitHub Free for organizations, the repository must be public. For example, you can have a dedicated branch and folder to hold your site source files, or you can use a custom GitHub Actions workflow to build and deploy your site source files. If you want to create a GitHub Pages site for a repository where not all of the files in the repository are related to the site, you will be able to configure a publishing source for your site. You can either create a repository or choose an existing repository for your site. For more information, see " Troubleshooting" in the Jekyll documentation. Luckily the issue has been patched, but it’s unknown whether hackers gained access to any of the sensitive user data before it was removed.Tip: If you see a Ruby error when you try to install Jekyll using Bundler, you may need to use a package manager, such as RVM or Homebrew, to manage your Ruby installation. It’s a reminder that even seemingly innocent actions can potentially lead to data breaches. The security lapse has only just been reported to the public to allow time to fully fix it. The leaky SAS token was replaced in July, and Microsoft completed its internal investigation in August. The report also noted that the creation of SAS tokens – which grant access to Azure Storage folders such as this one – does not create any kind of paper trail, meaning “there is no way for an administrator to know this token exists and where it circulates.” When a token has full-access permissions like this one did, the results can be potentially disastrous.įortunately, Wiz explains that it reported the issue to Microsoft in June 2023. Yet because it was open to manipulation thanks to its wrongly configured permissions, “an attacker could have injected malicious code into all the AI models in this storage account, and every user who trusts Microsoft’s GitHub repository would’ve been infected by it,” Wiz explains. As the repository was full of AI training data, the intention was for users to download it and feed it into a script, thereby improving their own AI models. ![]() Wiz explains that this could have had dire consequences. In practice, that meant that anyone who visited the URL could delete and overwrite the files they found, not merely view them. The access token that allowed all this was misconfigured to provide full control permissions, Wiz reported, rather than more restrictive read-only permissions. Microsoft says bizarre travel article was not created by ‘unsupervised AI’ Microsoft’s Copilot AI will have an ‘energy,’ apparently ![]() Bing Chat’s ads are sending users to dangerous malware sites
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |